Tim Smith, senior criminal lawyer, discusses select cases and asks a paralegal, case study help

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now

the scenarios and resulting simulations, Tim Smith, senior criminal
lawyer, discusses select cases and asks a paralegal to indicate which
courts would have exclusive jurisdiction of the cases in question. He
also discusses various pretrial procedures and illustrates them with
select cases. Finally, Tim Smith introduces the case of Roland Gary, who
served twenty-three (23) years in prison for a crime that he did not
commit. The case brought to light several key issues, along with the
manner in which they were resolved.

Use the Internet to research three real-life cases from the past five (5) years that fit the following criteria:

  • Cases that depict the unique processes related to different courts
  • The defendant accepted a plea bargain as an alternative to trial
  • The defendant was wrongly accused and later vindicated

Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:

  1. Discuss
    one (1) real-life criminal case, taken from current events, and
    identify the court that took jurisdiction. Explain why the court that
    took the case was the appropriate one for the particular circumstances.
  2. Discuss
    the real-life case that you have selected, in which the defendant
    accepted a plea bargain as an alternative to trial. Give your opinion on
    whether or not justice was served in the case in question. Provide a
    rationale for the response.
  3. Discuss
    the real-life case that you selected, in which, like Roland Gary, the
    defendant was wrongly accused and later vindicated. Explore one (1) key
    aspect of the case and examine its relation to the case at large.
    Describe the resolution to the selected case.
  4. Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be
    typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with
    one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA
    or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional
  • Include
    a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s
    name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover
    page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment
    page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Summarize the current ethical issues faced by criminal justice professionals and future of the criminal justice system.
  • Explain the development of American courts and illustrate the concept of the dual-court system.
  • Distinguish between the various courtroom participants, and describe the stages in a criminal trial.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in criminal justice.
  • Write clearly and concisely about criminal justice using proper writing mechanics and APA style conventions.

for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic /
organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the
following rubric.